I've written philosophy about travel photography before — the "tourist frame vs traveller frame" distinction. This is its sequel, but fully practical this time: what's in my bag, why it's there, and how I use it on the road. Read it as a field guide.
I haven't replaced it in years and don't plan to. Three reasons: battery life (a full day of city walking on one battery — on the road that means no charging anxiety), low-light performance (evening streets, dim markets, night skies — still usable files at ISO 6400) and file flexibility (the RAWs pull unbelievable detail from shadows; that's what rescues the frame you shot against the light). Every year its price drops, it becomes easier to recommend.
My frame's native language. 35mm is travel's natural focal length: it leans into portraits, gathers the street, shoots the breakfast on the table. And f/1.4 gives two things — freedom in low light, and a depth of field you can lean on when you want it. I use my feet instead of a zoom; this lens made me a better photographer because it doesn't permit laziness.
Budget-friendly, fully manual, the hero nobody expects. The 12mm's job is architecture and interiors: narrow streets, mosques, cave hotels, starry skies. Manual focus is no problem this wide — at f/5.6 almost everything is sharp. It builds the same frame as lenses ten times its price; don't worry about soft corners — the story doesn't live in the corners.
A good travel kit isn't built "just in case" — it's built "ready for every decision".
To see this recipe working in the field, look at my Cappadocia archive: balloon mornings belong to the 12mm (sky + valley in one frame), valley portraits to the 35mm. The selection below is a summary of how these two lenses converse on the same trip.

Send your date and the mood you imagine — I'll reply within 24 hours.
Get in Touch